WICKET: Warwickshire 85/3 (27.3 ov, trail by 167 - 1st inns) v Surrey IJ Westwood c Roy b Meaker 45 (92) Partnership: 27 (3.4 ov) SC Meaker 5.3-1-18-2 IR Bell 8* (7)
by ESPNcricinfo Live8/14/2016 11:50:24 AM
Using football analogy, sorry, it was like when Leeds and Man city got relegate and everyone said they were too good to go down, but they did. On paper Notts have every base covered, but ave been woeful. I blame their coach, i'm sure he was pretty poor in his last gig as well...
by dave8/14/2016 11:51:47 AM
INDIVIDUAL 50: NRD Compton 50* (129) Middlesex 185/1 (66.2 ov, trail by 19 - 1st inns) v Durham
by ESPNcricinfo Live8/14/2016 11:52:42 AM
WICKET: Sussex 59/1 (13 ov, trail by 308 - 1st inns) v Gloucs EC Joyce b Miles 25 (40) Partnership: 59 (13.0 ov) CN Miles 5-1-18-1 CD Nash 28* (40)
by ESPNcricinfo Live8/14/2016 11:54:03 AM
a timely knock by Compto - surely no way back for him, but with Hales, Vince and Balance being so poor and his record in India last time... could there be one last go?
by dave8/14/2016 11:54:16 AM
Poor old Pete Moores...
by StaggerBreaths8/14/2016 11:54:24 AM
Happy that Compton has a fifty.
by humair arshad8/14/2016 11:55:18 AM
...no. He's had it, surely. Even from the Middlesex line-up, they'd go for any of Robson, Gubbins, or Malan over him.
by StaggerBreaths8/14/2016 11:55:26 AM
I didn't want to know that actually Pears. 😠
by StaggerBreaths8/14/2016 11:55:53 AM
looking at the data, SB, Moore is neither old or poor, and therein lies the problem